This post originally appeared at the Fort Worth Weekly's website. To view it there : http://www.fwweekly.com/2016/10/12/sports-rush-candidates-could-learn-from-baseball/
Sunday night, a pair of competitions between contentious rivals took place simultaneously.
In St. Louis, Donald Trump debated Hillary Clinton. In Toronto, the
Texas Rangers played baseball against the hometown Blue Jays. Both
events came with a history of Vitriol punching Decorum in the face
(literally, in some cases).
Sunday’s session elevated an already ugly campaign to new levels of
contentiousness. Both candidates displayed an impressive mastery of each
other’s scandals, with virtually no personal attack left unuttered.
The baseball contest’s background had included preening bat flips and
HBPs and a Rougned Odor right cross to the jaw of Jose Bautista. Sunday
night, all the principals in the drama took the field with a lot at
stake, but all we saw in the potentially emotionally-charged atmosphere
was a baseball game.
Baseball bested politics in the head-to-head matchup. They did not do
so in the television ratings – over 100,000 more area households
watched the debate across its multiple networks than watched the
Rangers’ Division Series game on TBS. The sporting event did win the
sportsmanship category – easily.
We think of sportsmanship as applicable to athletic contests, but its
essence represents something larger. It embodies notions of civility
and the honoring of agreements.
Playing a game against an opponent necessarily involves each trying
to establish an unequal footing between the two combatants. By
participating in the contest, however, both sides implicitly or
explicitly agree to certain parameters. If you win by cheating, even if
you win so much you get tired of it, you really haven’t won at all
because your victory came at something other than what you’d agreed to. A
game is defined by its rules.
Most sports’ rulebooks include provisions for treating foes with
respect, and implied codes of conduct often go beyond what’s written
down. Beyond even those strictures, many (most?) of us likely prefer to
compete with someone who remains gracious in victory or defeat.
One rule of the debate was that the speakers were supposed to answer
certain questions. They ignored it from the first query, veering to
their prepared talking points with all possible haste. Both debaters
disdained time limits on answers and prohibitions on interruptions, even
when reminded of them by moderators.
The word “rule” also applies to what these persons hope to do if
successful in their campaigns. Thanks in large part to bilateral efforts
by the major parties to establish an imperial presidency, the chief
executive has enormous power to affect people’s lives. Will the elected
official follow the rules governing his or her office or will he or she
cheat? Will he or she treat others with respect? Will he or she display
the qualities of sportsmanship?
The Rangers are good at baseball. The Blue Jays are good at baseball.
Consecutive postseason appearances by both leave little doubt of that.
Would either Clinton or Trump be good at presidenting? It’s not much of a
stretch to suggest the debate performances still leave a lot of
questions about fitness to rule.
When a politician or athlete sets aside the qualities of
sportsmanship, he or she often seeks to justify the action as advancing
some greater good. A ballplayer who deceives an umpire does so to help
his team win. A government official may embrace policies of official
discrimination, Watergate break-ins, or eugenics based on the same
theory : the end justifies the means.
Both candidates cited the 16th president in their exchanges on
Sunday. Some evidence exists that Abraham Lincoln enjoyed the then
relatively new sport of baseball. Both candidates and ballplayers might
do well to remember one of his remarks about the ideal outlook for a
competitor.
“I am not bound to win. I am bound to be true.”
Rush Olson has spent two decades directing creative efforts for
sports teams and broadcasters. He currently creates ad campaigns,
television programs, and related creative projects for sports entities
through Rush Olson Creative & Sports and FourNine Productions.
RushOlson.com
Linkedin.com/company/rush-olson-creative-&-sports
Facebook.com/RushOlsonCreativeandSports
No comments:
Post a Comment