Showing posts with label trading deadline. Show all posts
Showing posts with label trading deadline. Show all posts

Wednesday, August 2, 2017

A Window on the Trading Deadline

This post originally appeared in the Stuff section of the Fort Worth Weekly's website. To consume it there : https://www.fwweekly.com/2017/08/02/trading-games/

A baseball trading deadline revolves around seeing the future. A team acquiring proven talent attempts to peer three months hence and occasionally as much as 15 months. A franchise adding prospects needs to see further, sometimes as much as four years or more.
Ironically, a word we use when talking about a baseball club’s ability to try to predict its near future is “window.” A winning club’s collection of talent is said to have a period of time when it’s a viable title contender before those players age and leave due to free agency, retirement, or cost-benefit analysis.

Heading into this season, the Texas Rangers returned the core of consecutive division title-winning teams led by the 2015 American League Manager of the Year. They added fan favorite and power threat Mike Napoli, plus TCU product Andrew Cashner. They had reason to expect continued progress from young players like Rougned Odor, Nomar Mazara, and Joey Gallo. 

Their window of opportunity seemed open. The 2017 Rangers have shown promising bursts, including May’s 10-game win streak and another five-gamer in June against first-place teams Washington and Houston. Overall, however, they have won fewer games than they have lost. Young players have not taken necessary steps forward, though the 23-year-old Gallo’s OPS north of .830 shows progress. Veterans have mostly underperformed. Cole Hamels missed time with an oblique strain. The relief pitching has inexplicably beached itself, as bullpens sometimes do.

This season’s window of contention, then, has likely rattled closed for the Rangers, and their trade deadline activity reflected it.  July 31 represents a key date in the baseball calendar, because it is the last date teams can trade players without sending them through waivers. From now through the end of the season, a team wishing to trade a player must put him through revocable waivers, a process that allows any team to claim him. At that point, the player’s current club must either pull him off waivers and keep him, trade him to the claiming team, or let the claimant take the player and his salary. Each player can only go through the process once a season, so it can stymie a lot of August trades. Teams therefore generally decide by July 31 whether their windows to win include the current campaign.
This July, the Rangers traded three established players for younger ones unlikely to help them win games this season. Catcher Jonathan Lucroy went to the Rockies for a player to be named later; relief pitcher Jeremy Jeffress moved to Milwaukee for minor league right-hander Tayler Scott; and starting pitcher Yu Darvish headed west to the Los Angeles Dodgers for prospects Willie Calhoun, A.J. Alexy, and Brendon Davis.

The returns for Lucroy and Jeffress will not have a substantial impact on any Rangers window. With the former posting a career-low batting average and the latter’s ERA at a career-high 5.31 at the time of the trade, the Rangers had to sell low. Baseball-reference.com rated both at below replacement level in 2017, implying that any average player would have performed better. One could argue that moving them might have made sense no matter where you found yourself in the standings, especially given that Colorado now has to pay a portion of Lucroy’s $5-plus million salary.

Darvish, however, likely offers substantial present value to any team. Baseball Reference estimated his WAR at 2.8, higher than any other Ranger. He has struck out more than a batter per inning and offers a bewildering selection of pitches. Banister declared that losing his team’s only All-Star selection doesn’t mean his group won’t have a chance to contend. He should say that, because his job entails motivating the men he manages, and players view the possibility of October baseball as an important enticement. Also, Banister could be right. We don’t know because we haven’t played the games yet. Other contenders could suffer slumps or injuries, and his roster could improve its performance. Darvish’s departure makes it unlikely, however, that the Rangers’ window of contention will extend into 2017.
The Rangers fan must ask that if 2017 is not the team’s window, when is? The team’s current run dates to 2010, with Texas playing beyond the standard 162 regular season games every year since then other than an injury-crushed 2014. Its success rested on a strong minor league system fortified by prescient trades, draft choices, and international signings. The club supplemented its internal promotions with free agent signings and by using its farm depth to trade for the likes of Hamels, Cliff Lee, and Mike Adams.

If General Manager Jon Daniels polishes the glass on his crystal ball and spies a chance to contend next season, it means he sees enough tools either currently on the roster, ready to be promoted from the minor leagues, or likely to be acquired in the offseason. Perhaps internal evaluations indicate they can expect improved performance from current guys. They might also look at signing free agents. Darvish will become available again, if they want to make a run at him. Last year, the Yankees effectively rented Aroldis Chapman to the Cubs before re-signing him in the offseason. The Cubbies did the same the year before in bringing Jason Hammel back from Oakland after dealing him there mid-season. 

Darvish makes $11 million this year and can expect to command more than double that next year, barring injury. Texas has $61.5 million in combined commitments to three thirtysomething players next year (Hamels, Adrián Beltré, and Shin-soo Choo) and the 29-year-old Elvis Andrus. Could they afford to re-up with Darvish and, since they would need to improve on what they had this season even with the big right-hander, also add another big-ticket free agent like Wade Davis or J.D. Martinez?

In a sport without a hard salary cap, the Rangers’ revenues have an impact on payroll acquisitions. The way ticket sales cycles go, the club will likely have less money to work with for next year’s budget. A non-playoff season means less money coming in during the all-important winter season and group ticket sales period. We can also expect limited sponsor revenue-producing additions to the current ballpark (à la the Hyundai Club or left field video board of recent years) with a new stadium on the horizon.

In terms of internal help, it’s not out of the question that Calhoun or Ronald Guzman could emerge from AAA to impact the big club next year. Perhaps Nick Martinez will surface as a reliable starter. The Rangers’ farm system is not what it once was, though, weakened in part by the trades for Ryan Dempster, Matt Garza, and others, made to extend the current competitive window. This year’s trade deadline deals won’t hurt, but they won’t move the needle there, either.

If the Rangers’ next window isn’t 2018, when is it? To get back to winning its division consistently, and earning its best chance at succeeding in the crapshoot that is the postseason, Texas must overcome its A.L. West foes. Most of the teams have remained bunched in the middle of the standings this year. Various services rank the minor league systems of the Rangers, Angels, and Mariners in the lower third of baseball. The A’s get placed a bit higher, and their own deadline trade of Sonny Gray improved their system further, but unless they get a new facility and improve their ability to boost payroll, Oakland isn’t a long-term threat.

The young and talented Astros present problems, however. In addition to running away with the division in 2017, they possess one of the major leagues’ top development pipelines. How can the Rangers match up with them in 2019 and beyond? In 2008 and 2009, Daniels and his staff, along with then-president Nolan Ryan, brilliantly identified who in their current organization could help them win and which players they’d need to acquire. They thought they might surprise in 2009 (and they almost did), and they knew they would in 2010. That’s their challenge now — to figure out when they’ll be good again and who needs to still be here when it happens. It’s not an easy process, because everyone wants to win now, but the organization needs, above all, to be realistic about it.

Daniels’ office, like many on the fourth floor of Globe Life Park in Arlington’s center field building, has a window overlooking the diamond. Every so often, workers walk the ballpark balconies cleaning the glass. Rangers fans hope they do a good job, because for JD and his staff, it’s all about clear vision and windows. 

Rush Olson has spent two decades directing creative efforts for sports teams and broadcasters. He currently creates ad campaigns, television programs, and related creative projects for sports entities through Rush Olson Creative & Sports, Mint Farm Films, and FourNine Productions.

RushOlson.com
Linkedin.com/company/rush-olson-creative-&-sports
Facebook.com/RushOlsonCreativeandSports

Wednesday, July 26, 2017

Rangers Trading Deadline History

This post originally appeared in the Blotch section of the Fort Worth Weekly's website. To consume it there : https://www.fwweekly.com/2017/07/25/sports-rush-trading-deadline-what-have-we-done/

As baseball’s non-waiver trading deadline approaches, we find ourselves asking important questions. Are we buyers? Are we sellers? Are we standpatters?

Teams really try not to be standpatters, and not just because it’s actually not a word. You either want to get better for this year so you can win the World Series now or improve for subsequent years so you can win the World Series then.

Should the Rangers be sellers this year, unloading veterans in return for young players who need seasoning but have high upsides? Or should they buy talent at the price of their own farm system depth? I’m a flip-flopper, because while the hometown team is not currently in playoff position, part of me thinks they could sneak into a wild card slot, and once in the postseason teams can get hot. Darvish and Hamels could pitch lights out and Beltre could rake and that new-bullpen-piece-we-acquired-because-we-decided-we-were-buyers could dominate.

Or the team might give up prospects for proven talent and tank anyway. Both scenarios have happened to clubs before. So if I can’t predict the future, I decided I would look at the past.  Perhaps you’ll remember some of these in-season exchanges.

On May 30, 1972, that first Texas team traded Norm McRae to the Tigers for Dalton Jones. McRae never threw another pitch in the big leagues and Jones hit .159 for the Rangers that year in what would turn out to be the final 166 plate appearances of his Major League career. Jones was the older player, so we can characterize the Rangers as buyers. However, they were 16-23 when they made the deal and would lose 100 games, so they should have been sellers. In fact, Rangers manager Ted Williams knew Jones from his time with the Red Sox and I’ll surmise that had something to do with the club’s first-ever “deadline deal.”

In those days, the non-waiver deadline was earlier, June 15, and only two teams per league made the postseason. When the deadline moved to July 30 in 1986 and the playoffs expanded in 1994 and 2012, mid-season trade activity increased. The stakes have also risen as prospects have become an increasingly valued commodity. Deals get made after the deadline, too, although they are more difficult because other teams can block the trade by claiming a player off waivers (with the risk that they may have to take on his salary if his current club decides to unload it).

The guys in Arlington have made some solid deals as buyers. On July 9, 2010, they sent Matt Lawson, Blake Beavan, Josh Lueke, and Justin Smoak to the Mariners for Cliff Lee and Mark Lowe. Do they reach their first World Series without Lee? Probably not, so it’s hard to say any deal had a bigger impact than that one. None of the other players in the deal really did a lot until Smoak’s breakout season this year for Toronto.

On July 31, 2015, Jorge Alfaro, Alec Asher, Jerad Eickhoff, Matt Harrison, Jake Thompson and Nick Williams went to the Philadelphia Phillies for Jake Diekman and Cole Hamels. Hamels and Diekman have been key contributors to two playoff teams, so no matter how good the young players they gave up become, it’ll be hard to count this as something other than a win.

Perhaps the best deal as a buyer actually worked out more like a seller’s deal for Texas. On July 28, 2006 Julian Cordero, Francisco Cordero, Kevin Mench and Laynce Nix went to the Brewers in exchange for veteran Carlos Lee and stalled prospect Nelson Cruz. Coco became Milwaukee’s closer and Lee hit ok for the Rangers in an ultimately fruitless ’06 playoff pursuit. But the deal’s “insurance,” Cruz, became perhaps the most impactful postseason player in Rangers history.

As sellers, one deal that’s still paying dividends is the July 31, 2007 one in which Ron Mahay and Mark Teixeira went to the Atlanta Braves. Texas received Beau Jones, Neftali Feliz, Matt Harrison, Jarrod Saltalamacchia, and their current starting shortstop, Elvis Andrus. They also picked up David Murphy from the Red Sox that day and he now contributes as a broadcaster after posting some good years on the field for winning Rangers teams.
photo credit: Brian Gagnon/Texas Rangers
photo credit: Brian Gagnon/Texas Rangers
The July 19, 1985 trade of an aging Buddy Bell to the Reds for a player to be named later and Duane Walker turned out well for the Rangers when future closer Jeff Russell became the PTBNL four days hence.

They don’t all work out as well. Robb Nen might been Russell’s heir as closer had he not gone to the Marlins with Kurt Miller for Cris Carpenter (not to be confused with future Rangers nemesis Chris Carpenter) on July 17, 1993. Nen saved more than 300 games for the Marlins and Giants.
One deal that drives one crazy is the 2011 Chris Davis/Tommy Hunter for Koji Uehara trade with the Baltimore Orioles. Davis became a star, which would have been fine if the Rangers had gotten what they needed from the trade. While Texas did go to the World Series that year, Uehara inexplicably had the highest ERA of his career pitching three months for the Rangers and didn’t make the World Series roster. Two years later he became ALCS MVP for the Red Sox and allowed no runs in five World Series appearances. Rangers fans may recall a need for a shutdown reliever in a certain Game 6.

Fans might feel a similar frustration about the August 19, 1983 trade that sent Rick Honeycutt to the Dodgers for Dave Stewart and Ricky Wright. Stewart’s talent never emerged with Texas, but he became a star for the Athletics teams the Rangers chased in the late 1980s.

Another tough one came in 2001 as Ruben Mateo went to the Cincinnati Reds for young pitcher Rob Bell. Bell never realized his high upside, but the teenager the Reds convinced Texas to add to the deal became All-Star infielder/DH Edwin Encarnación.

On June 29, 1989, the Rangers traded Tack Wilson and Scott May to the Milwaukee Brewers for Todd Simmons and LaVel Freeman. None of those players ever played in the bigs for their new team. And had that been it for 1989, the year would not have been included in this roundup. Unfortunately, however, there was another trade that summer. Exactly a month later, Texas picked up a veteran bat they thought might propel them to their first postseason berth, plus a serviceable utility infielder. Harold Baines and Fred Manrique did not get the Rangers across the threshold. However, Wilson Alvarez, Scott Fletcher and Sammy Sosa went to the Chicago White Sox in the swap, making this likely the most notorious trade in Rangers history.

As sellers on July 11, 2003, Texas executed a superb exchange in sending Ugueth Urbina to the Florida Marlins for Adrian Gonzalez, Will Smith, and Ryan Snare. And it would have been a perfect example of the vet winning a ring and the young player developing into a potential Hall of Famer for his new team, except that Gonzalez had his superb career with the Padres, Red Sox, and Dodgers after later deals.

More than one player, including Saltalamacchia, has been both acquired and traded at separate deadlines. Ryan Dempster went to the Marlins on August 8, 1996 for veteran right-hander John Burkett, which helped Texas to its first division title. On July 31, 2012, Texas brought Dempster back at the cost of Christian Villanueva and Kyle Hendricks. Dempster posted a 5.09 ERA in 12 starts with Texas, but Hendricks helped push his new team, the Cubs, to a World Series win last fall.
The guy who went with Dempster to Florida came back to the Rangers on August 12, 1997 as the Rangers were sellers. Ed Vosberg went to the Marlins, who were on the way to their first championship. Rick Helling returned to the club that had drafted him and led the starting staff of two Rangers postseason teams.

In 1998, the club picked up another one of those twice-dealt guys, Esteban Loaiza, along with Todd Stottlemyre and Royce Clayton in deadline deals. Those players helped push Texas to a second A.L. West title.

Who’s the best player ever acquired by Texas in an in-season deal? You could make the case for Cruz, Hamels, Lee, or for Michael Young, who came to Texas with Darwin Cubillan on July 19, 2000 for Loaiza. The Rangers also picked up future Hall of Fame curveballer Bert Blyleven in a 1976 deal. But this is, in fact, a trick question. The best player Texas ever acquired was . . . Ivan “Pudge” Rodriguez. By the time of his August 19, 2009 re-acquisition from the Astros, he was no longer the perennial Gold Glover and offensive force of his first swing through Arlington. But he’s Pudge and I expect to get no argument from Rangers fans about this selection.

So now you have an overview of past Rangers deadline deals. If I left out your favorite Ruben Sierra or Ed Kirkpatrick trade, I apologize. Perhaps in a few years they’ll be included when I write about how we just reacquired Justin Smoak or Nick Williams.


Rush Olson has spent two decades directing creative efforts for sports teams and broadcasters. He currently creates ad campaigns, television programs, and related creative projects for sports entities through Rush Olson Creative & Sports and FourNine Productions.

RushOlson.com
Linkedin.com/company/rush-olson-creative-&-sports
Facebook.com/RushOlsonCreativeandSports