This post originally appeared at the Fort Worth Weekly's website. To view it there : http://www.fwweekly.com/2016/06/22/sports-rush-mazara-is-in-a-great-position/
We’ve known a lot about Texas Rangers outfielder Nomar Mazara
since he became a rich man at the age of sixteen years old. The Rangers
paid the Dominican millions to join their organization, and baseball’s
prospect evaluation machine kicked into overdrive.
Mazara’s tools and his record signing bonus made him a buzz-worthy
player, as had his rapid progression through the minor leagues. All of
the prospect-rating services had him highly ranked headed into this
year, and he has not disappointed since making his Major League debut in
April.
The team’s minor league system has annually ranked among the game’s
best the past few years. The organization has produced loads of touted
prospects. Mazara has one unique quality that makes him stand out from
other latter-day projected future stars: his position.
Homegrown infielders like Ian Kinsler, Mitch Moreland, and Rougned
Odor have joined organizational pitchers like C.J. Wilson, Derek
Holland, Tommy Hunter, and Martin Perez on recent postseason rosters.
Far fewer DIY Rangers from Mazara’s position group have starred in
recent Octobers. The likes of Josh Hamilton, Shin-Soo Choo, Nelson Cruz,
and David Murphy arrived via trades or free agency. The idea, then,
that an outfielder the club signed and developed has become close to a
can’t-miss prospect creates excitement – excitement like we haven’t seen
since . . . since . . . how about Juan González and Rubén Sierra?
The Rangers have had only two players ranked as a Baseball America
Top 50 outfield prospect since the rankings began in 1990. 1992’s number
40-ranked Terrell Lowery played 123 Major League games, none of them
with Texas. The other one we’ll get to in a moment.
I discussed the Sierra/González comparisons with three long-time
Rangers experts : broadcasters Steve Busby, Tom Grieve, and Eric Nadel.
All agreed that the overall level of prospect hype has grown
significantly since the mid-to-late 1980s when Sierra and González came
of age. Grieve pointed out that we had no Newberg Report, no sports talk
radio, and a much lower profile for the Baseball America publication.
In general, however, all three pointed out that when Sierra and
González did arrive, it was with as much fanfare as the era could
muster. Nadel remembered then-Rangers hitting coach Tom Robson pointing
out Sierra’s five tools and calling him “the franchise.” That first
Baseball America Top 100 list in 1990 had González ranked fourth in all
of baseball, trailing top-ranked Steve Avery as well as Ben McDonald and
Jon Olerud. More ratings services exist now, and Mazara’s highest slot
has been a fifth place by Baseball Prospectus.
Mazara, then, is close to the Caballo/Igor level of prospect status
(and after two consecutive A.L. Rookie of the Month awards, has pretty much
moved from being designated a prospect to becoming a bona fide Major
Leaguer). The difference, as Grieve sees it, is certainty. As the
Rangers GM at the time, he had better information than anyone about
players’ talent levels, and he noted that pretty much everyone knew that
Sierra and Gonzalez would be stars. Their “future was more visible,” as
Grieve put it, than Mazara’s at this point in their development cycles.
That doesn’t mean the broadcasters don’t envision a potential
perennial All-Star future for Mazara. Both Nadel and Grieve suggested
that his body reminded them of González. Busby praised Mazara’s calm
demeanor and his makeup, citing a May 10 pinch-hit appearance in which
Mazara patiently worked a walk one night after going 0-6. He thought
Mazara might be a more disciplined hitter than either Sierra or González
were at a young age. The panel of experts are all excited by Mazara’s
power potential, his hit tool, and his arm – qualities they admired in
Sierra and González as young players.
Rangers fans hope the young Dominican’s results match those of his
80s predecessors, including a similarly regarded outfielder named Sammy
Sosa. They’d probably also be happy with a career matching that of Rusty
Greer, whose name Nadel brought up. Greer never made a Baseball America
Rangers Top 10 prospects list, much less a national one. Grieve noted
that nobody in or out of the organization foresaw the 10th-round pick
forging a career worthy of induction into the Rangers Hall of Fame.
Grieve also mentioned a pair of highly anticipated mid-80s
outfielders who never quite matched their college production, Oddibe
McDowell and Pete Incaviglia (whom the Rangers didn’t draft, but for
whom they traded before he made his pro debut in the Major Leagues). The
duo’s solid but not exceptional careers demonstrate that there is no
sure thing when it comes to predicting players’ futures. An even better
example might be that of the only other Rangers outfielder named a
Baseball America Top 10 national prospect. Rubén Mateo
placed ninth in 1999 and sixth in 2000. The Dominican Republic native
broke camp with Texas in 2000 and was hitting .291 with a .786 OPS when
he suffered a terrible leg injury in his 52nd game of that season. The
five-tool hopeful would play only 40 more games for the Rangers and
never realize the promise his hype might have indicated.
Mazara has played 63 games going into tonight’s game against the team
to whom the Rangers traded Mateo, the Reds. He is hitting .291 with a
.780 OPS.
Every player needs a little luck to succeed. For Mazara’s sake, and
that of the Rangers, we’ll hope he avoids injury and becomes the next
Rangers outfielder to remind us of Señor Octubre.
Rush Olson has spent two decades directing creative efforts for
sports teams and broadcasters. He currently creates ad campaigns,
television programs, and related creative projects for sports entities
through Rush Olson Creative & Sports and FourNine Productions.
RushOlson.com
Linkedin.com/company/rush-olson-creative-&-sports
Facebook.com/RushOlsonCreativeandSports
No comments:
Post a Comment